|
Clin Appl Immunol Rev, 2001, 1, 131
THERAPY OF INFECTIONS IN CANCER PATIENTS WITH
BACTERIOPHAGES
B. Weber-D¹browska, M. Mulczyk, A. Górski.
L. Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy,
Polish Academy of Sciences
53-114 Wroc³aw, Poland
Correspondence should be addressed to B.W.D.,
e-mail: secret@immuno.iitd.pan.wroc.pl
Abbreviations: BP - bacteriophage, cancer, infections.
ABSTRACT
Cancer patients are known to be immunocompromised and
susceptible to infections. We have used bacteriophages matched for specific
bacterial isolates to treat antibiotic-resistant infections in those patients.
Cure of infection was achived in all cases indicating very highefficacy of BP
therapy.
Bacteriophages (BP) belong to a group of viruses whose life
cycle is connected exclusively with bacterial cells. So far over 4,000 phages
affecting a large majority of bacteria have been described [1-3].
After a bacterial cell sensitive to a particular kind of phage
is infected, the phage replicates, bringing about the total destruction (lysis)
of the cell, and the new phage particles which are released attack and destroy
other live bacterial cells. The process takes place both in vitro and in vivo.
One of the very important features of phages is the high specificity of their
lytic action. Phages affect one or several related species of bacteria; they do
not affect antigenically unrelated bacteria.
BP therapy was initiated with some success in the second and
third decade of this century, however, since the advent and widespread
acceptance of antibiotics it has been little used in the West. In the recent
years, however, bacterial resistance to antibiotics has becomea serious medical
problem and a major threat to human wealth. Therefore, there is a renewed
interest in using BP therapy as a possible alternative tor the treatment of
bacterial infections[2, 4, 5, 6].
Since 1987 the specific BP have been used
in our Institute for the treatmentof more than 1400 patients. The results
obtained indicate that in cases of long persistent bacterial infections caused
by drug-resistant bacteria of the genera Staphylococcus, Escherichia,
Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus and Pseudomonas that do not respond to
antibiotics, BP therapy is highly effective and in large majority of cases the
only successful and safe treatment. The overall cure rate across the spectrum of
pathogens and side of infections is approximately85 %. BP therapy has proved to
be most effective in purulent otitis media, purulent cerebro- spinal meningitis
and furunculosis. BP have also proved highly effective in septicemia,
infectionsofrespiratorytractandpurulentpostoperativeinfections [7].
Furthermore,our recent data suggest that aside from the well-known antibacterial
activity BP can upregulate depressed immune responses when administered in patients with
infections [8]. Interestingly, short incubation of human lymphocytes and
monocytes with BP in vitro may induce intracytoplasmatic cytokine synthesis in
lymphocytes and monocytes (Górski et al., unpublished observations). This
phenomenon may explain our earlier observations indicating that patients who had
undergone BP treatment may acquire increased resistance to subsequent bacterial
and viral infections [7]. For those reasons, bacterial infections in
immunocompromised cancer patients should be a special target for BP treatment.
Our initial observations in that group seem tosubstantiate this hypothesis.
Crude BP preparation was obtained as described in details
elsewhere [7]. Briefly, BP derived from our Institutes BP banking facility were
examined for their lytic activity against respective bacteria isolated and
cultivated from infected patients. Selected BP were propagated in broth and
subsequently used for treatment. The mean activity of the BP lysates used was
108plaque forming units/ml. Purifications of BP was performed according to
the method for purification of biological preparates using sepharose4B column.
The final purification of BP, which allows to remove bacterial debris and medium
components was performed by different ultracentrifugation steps.
BPtreatmentwasappliedin 20 cancer patients (age: 1 - 66
years,17 with solid tumors, 3 with hematological malignanciess, all with
concurrent bacterial infections (Staphylococcus aureus (8 patients), Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (9), Klebsiella pneumoniae (6), Klebsiella oxytoca (2), Escherichia
coli (6). Those infections were homogenous (12 patients) and mixed (8 patients).
All patients had previously been treated with antibiotics without
apparenteffects.In allpatients, BP wereadministeredorally 3
timesdaily.Inaddition,in
8 patients local BP treatment was added to an oral protocol.
The duration of the treatment varied between 2 and 9 weeks (median: 32 days). No
side effects of the therapy were observed.
The results of BP therapy are depicted in Table 1. As may be
seen, the cure of infection was achieved in all cases (cessation of suppuration,
closure of wounds, eradication of pneumonia etc.).
Although our results are preliminary, they appear to be very
promising, since BP therapy was found to be highly efficient in all patients in
whom antibiotic therapy failed. Further studies are currently underway involving
placebo-controlled designs to delineate optimal conditions and efficacy of the
BP therapy.
In summary, we have demonstrated that BP can cure bacterial
infections in cancer patients and probably upregulate immune response in those
patients.
Centers porticipating in the BP therapy:
The Medical University of Wroc³aw (Departments of Dermatology
(Dr Kaniowska), Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Dr H. Kaczkowski), Pediatrics (Dr Wróbel),
Child Surgery (Dr Sawicz), Neurosurgery (Dr Gieroń), Low Silesian Oncology
Center (Dr Hirowska), Marciniak Hospital (Dr Szewczak), County Hospital (Dr
Wierzbowski), Babiński Hospital (Dr Kowalska), City Hospital, Brzeg Dolny (Dr
Nowak), City Hospital, Pszczyna (Dr Bodnar), County Hospital, Jelenia Góra (Dr
Dworski).
The BP treatment has been approved by Wroc³aw Medical
University Ethical Commission for Studies Involving Human Subject.
This work was supported by grant4PO5B 012 18 from KBN (State
Committee for Research).
REFERENCES
[1] Duckworth DH. Bacteriophages. In: Granoff A., Webster RG.,
editors. Encyclopedia of virology,Academic Press, 1999;725-730.
[2] Lorch A. Bacteriophages: an alternative to antibioties?
Biotech Develop Monitor 1999; 39: 14-17.
[3] Carlton RM. Phage therapy: past history and future
prospects. Arch Immun Ther Exp 1999; 47: 267-274.
[4] Glimore MS., Hoch JA.: A vancomycin surprise. Nature 1999,
399:524-526.
[5] Sieradzki K., Roberts RB., Haber SW., Tomasz A.: The
development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus infection. New Eng J Med 1999, 340:517-523.
[6] Smith TL., Pearson ML., Wilcox KR.: Emergence of vancomycin
resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. New Eng J Med 1999, 340:493-501.
[7] lopek S., Durlakowa I., Weber-D¹browska B.,
Kucharewicz-Krukowska A. D¹browski M., Bisikiewicz R.: Results of bacteriophage
treatment of suppurative bacterial infections. Arch Immun Ther Exp 1983,
31:267-291.
[8] Weber-D¹browska B., Zimecki M., Mulczyk M.: Effective phage
therapy is associated with normalization of cytokine production by blood cell
cultures. Arch Immun Ther Exp 2000, 48:31-37.
Table 1. Effect of bacteriophage therapy in cancer patients.
|
Bacteriophage Therapy in Cancer Patients |
| Number of cancer patients |
|
20 |
| Type of cancer |
Solid tumors Hematological malignancy |
17 3 |
| Type of Infection |
Post-operative Septicemia Skin Pneumonia Decubitus Post-X Meningitis |
13 7 4 6 1 1 1 |
| Route of BP administration |
Oral Local |
20 8 |
|
Result of Treatment |
Good / ++ Very good / +++ |
17* 3** |
|
*complete healing of the local lesions and
termination of the suppurative process
** as above + general
improvement |
Figure 1. Shigella K II bacteriophage. Virions
adsorbed on a fragment of a bacterial cell; a - cell fragment, d - collar,b - capsid without nucleic acid, e - contracted sheath,
c - capsid filled with nucleic acid, f- core;(magn.: 290 000).
|